From 2901cf43bf45ff322fb62286c3bf1594b55c20ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: 53hornet Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:23:27 -0400 Subject: chore: rename html to php, add donate/payments page, update cv --- drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php (limited to 'drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php') diff --git a/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php b/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8b5462e --- /dev/null +++ b/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +

Writing Documents: Markdown? LaTeX? WINWORD.EXE? Nope, just HTML

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ I've been without MS Word for quite a few years since I switched away from + Windows and honestly I haven't needed it. I took notes and wrote documents in + Markdown for a while. That was alright because the syntax is easy and any text + editor can read a Markdown file. Sometimes I need shareable formatting, so + recently I started using HTML for all documents I intend to share, upload, or + print. +

+ +

+ The year is 2021 and I write all my formatted documents in HTML. It sounds + needless but if you think about it it makes a lot of sense. HTML after all was + designed to be the streaming document of choice when the web was introduced to + the world. So it's tailor-made for shareable, digital documents. + Over the years the specification has gotten larger, and most of the syntax required by a typical user is present. +

+ +

+ But why bother? What are the "benefits"? Well, HTML is ubiquitous. And by that + I mean literally everyone can read an HTML document because literally + everyone has a web browser installed. Friends don't have Word? Use Google + Docs? Use Apple Pages? Forget it. I bet you all of those folks have a web + browser that was made after 1999. That means they can all read your document, + either by visiting it on your site or receiving it in an email. +

+ +

+ What's easier than reading HTML is writing it. Anyone with a text editor can + do it. Heck, even those folks with Word installed can save their documents as + [reasonable] HTML. And the tags aren't that hard to learn. I don't think that + Markdown is an easier syntax to learn and understand. HTML's tags are only + slightly more verbose and the structure is a pro, not a con. It's certainly + easier than writing a document in LaTeX. I would even argue in some ways it's + easier than working with a WYSIWYG editor. At least the formatting you're + looking for isn't getting shuffled from menu to sub-menu. +

+ +

+ Sometimes folks want a PDF instead. Okay, fine. For whatever reason PDFs are + the reigning document of the land. That doesn't mean you need Adobe Acrobat or + some custom setup involving + wkhtmltopdf. Or even worse, some strange LaTeX middleware via + pandoc. You don't need any of that! The best PDF reader in the + world, MuPDF, also comes with mutool. + mutool convert [options] file [pages] will convert a variety of + formats to or from a PDF. And the results look terrific going from an HTML to + a PDF. If you want, you can customize the results by writing CSS into + @media print queries. Automate the creation with a script when + you safe the underlying document. Sky's the limit! +

+ +

+ But what about presentations or slideshows? Surely, the "minimal" solution is + to use something like Suckless' sent right? Well, you can also do + slideshows in HTML! Just a little CSS and some section and + a tags and you've got a click-able, full-browser slideshow with + images, links, titles, icons, flowcharts, embedded videos, and a printable + slide deck. And the best part is that you can instantly share online by + dropping it into a public web root. You don't have to use Google Slides or + some other third-party slide creator online that none of your friends use. + Heck, Suckless sent is just that: yet another slideshow tool that + does one thing and nobody but you has it installed. Your HTML slides are + just as plain text as a sent deck. +

-- cgit v1.2.3