From a1eda32d9856e3ed5e06de73c9bc194f81891697 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Adam T. Carpenter" <atc@53hor.net>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:52:56 -0400
Subject: added a bunch and published bad animated page titles

---
 drafts/it's not rust vs go.html | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

(limited to 'drafts/it's not rust vs go.html')

diff --git a/drafts/it's not rust vs go.html b/drafts/it's not rust vs go.html
index 6826d55..c9273ff 100644
--- a/drafts/it's not rust vs go.html	
+++ b/drafts/it's not rust vs go.html	
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 <h1>"Rust or Go?" is not the question</h1>
 <h1>Part 2: (But Rust is definitely the answer)</h1>
+<h1>Part 3: Rust is definitely production ready</h1>
 -> part 2 include coworker conversation tidbits draft notes:
 <ul>
   <li>These are two very different languages</li>
@@ -71,6 +72,32 @@
 
 <a href="https://killedbygoogle.com/"> Killed by Google</a>
 
+<a href="https://dart.dev/overview">The Dart Programming Language</a>
+
+<a
+  href="https://blog.discord.com/why-discord-is-switching-from-go-to-rust-a190bbca2b1f?gi=c8caad873419"
+  >Discord swapped Go for Rust</a
+>
+
+<blockquote>
+  Both Microsoft and Amazon have just recently announced and released their new
+  officially supported Rust libraries for interacting with Windows and AWS.
+  Official first party support for these massive APIs helps make Rust people's
+  first choice when deciding what to use for their project.
+</blockquote>
+<a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/05/15/six-years-of-rust.html"
+  >Source</a
+>
+
+<a href="https://hub.packtpub.com/is-dart-programming-dead-already/"
+  >Dart -- apples to oranges? I'm not trying to say that go is going the way of
+  dart, I'm trying to say that industry-leading companies aren't always stewards
+  of their creations. take FreeBSD. It's a thriving, excellent operating system
+  capable of "industry-leading company" usage. See the usuals (Netflix, Sony,
+  etc). Look at the FreeBSD foundation. Now look at RedHat and IBM. Again,
+  apples to oranges? No, just a bad argument to make in the first place.</a
+>
+
 <p>quotables</p>
 
 <blockquote>
@@ -85,6 +112,19 @@
   apps. Rust can be better for a single-thread app or general "systems"
   programming.
 </blockquote>
+
+<p>
+  Rust is not a "systems programming" language. Systems programming is not a
+  genre of languages. It's not like saying Italian is a "Romantic language".
+  Systems programming is a specific, targeted programming *application*. It's
+  the destination, the use-case that a language is being applied to. Rust is a
+  general-purpose programming language. I have used it to write a variety of
+  tools, low- and high-level, server-side and client-side, graphical and CLI.
+  Yes, I used it for some systems programming. Also used it to make a very
+  simple and robust web service digested by a variety of other developers at our
+  company.
+</p>
+
 <blockquote>
   The only way is to learn and try both. That's what I did. Most of the info
   from both sides is biased...Go is definitely very fast and [garbage
@@ -102,3 +142,9 @@
   next year or two on which direction things end up going. For Rust to benefit
   long-term, it needs the support of a corporate backer
 </blockquote>
+
+<p>Rust is absolutely ready for production use.</p>
+<p>
+  Anti-Rust zealotry is just as strong as pro-Rust zealotry. The hype goes both
+  ways. No, your talking points shouldn't come from Reddit.
+</p>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3