From f3aa420f1e39a6ff402429a0e13922fa64bc179f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Carpenter Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:20:09 -0400 Subject: Published data recovery --- ...-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md | 204 +++++++++++++++++++++ posts/my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md | 53 ------ 2 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) create mode 100644 posts/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md delete mode 100644 posts/my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md (limited to 'posts') diff --git a/posts/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md b/posts/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d508077 --- /dev/null +++ b/posts/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +--- +permalink: "/posts/{{categories}}/{{slug}}" +title: My Preferred Method for Data Recovery +categories: + - life +tags: + - data + - file + - photo + - recovery + - linux + - photorec +excerpt_separator: "\n\n\n" +published_date: "2019-09-28 20:20:05 +0000" +layout: post.liquid +is_draft: false +--- +This week Amy plugged in her flash drive to discover that there were no files +on it. Weeks before there had been dozens of large cuts of footage that she +needed to edit down for work. Hours of recordings were seemingly gone. And the +most annoying part was the drive had worked perfectly on several other +occasions. Just not now that the footage was actually needed of course. +Initially it looked like everything had been wiped clean, however both Amy's +Mac and her PC thought the drive was half full. It's overall capacity was 64GB +but it showed only about 36GB free. So there still had to be data on there if +we could find the right tool to salvage it. + +Luckily this wasn't the first time I had to recover accidentally (or magically) +deleted files. I had previously done so with some success at my tech support +job, for some college friends, and for my in-laws' retired laptops. So I had a +pretty clear idea of what to expect. The only trick was finding a tool that +knew what files it was looking for. The camera that took the video clips was a +Sony and apparently they record into `m2ts` files, which are kind of a unique +format in that they only show up on Blu-Ray discs and Sony camcorders. Enter my +favorite two tools for dealing with potentially-destroyed data: `ddrescue` and +`photorec`. + +## DDRescue + +`ddrescue` is a godsend of a tool. If you've ever used `dd` before, forget +about it. Use `ddrescue`. You might as well `alias dd=ddrescue` because it's +that great. By default it has a plethora of additional options, displays the +progress as it works, recovers and retries in the event of I/O errors, and does +everything that good old `dd` can do. It's particularly good at protecting +partitions or disks that have been corrupted or damaged by rescuing undamaged +portions first. Oh, and have you ever had to cancel a `dd` operation? Did I +mention that `ddrescue` can pause and resume operations? It's that good. + +## PhotoRec + +`photorec` is probably the best missing file recovery tool I've ever used in my +entire life. And I've used quite a few. I've never had as good results as I've +had with `photorec` with other tools like Recuva et. al. And `photorec` isn't +just for photos, it can recover documents (a la Office suite), music, images, +config files, and videos (including the very odd `m2ts` format!). The other +nice thing is `photorec` will work on just about any source. It's also free +software which makes me wonder why there are like $50 recovery tools for +Windows that look super sketchy. + +## In Practice + +So here's what I did to get Amy's files back. Luckily she didn't write anything +out to the drive afterward so the chances (I thought) were pretty good that I +would get *something* back. The first thing I always do is make a full image of +whatever media I'm trying to recover from. I do this for a couple of reasons. +First of all it's a backup. If something goes wrong during recovery I don't +have to worry about the original, fragile media being damaged or wiped. +Furthermore, I can work with multiple copies at a time. If it's a large image +that means multiple tools or even multiple PCs can work on it at once. It's +also just plain faster working off a disk image than a measly flash drive. So I +used `ddrescue` to make an image of Amy's drive. + +```shell +$ sudo ddrescue /dev/sdb1 amy-lexar.dd +GNU ddrescue 1.24 +Press Ctrl-C to interrupt + ipos: 54198 kB, non-trimmed: 0 B, current rate: 7864 kB/s + opos: 54198 kB, non-scraped: 0 B, average rate: 18066 kB/s +non-tried: 63967 MB, bad-sector: 0 B, error rate: 0 B/s + rescued: 54198 kB, bad areas: 0, run time: 2s +pct rescued: 0.08%, read errors: 0, remaining time: 59m + time since last successful read: n/a +Copying non-tried blocks... Pass 1 (forwards) +``` + +The result was a very large partition image that I could fearlessly play around +with. + +```shell +$ ll amy-lexar.dd +-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 60G Sep 24 02:45 amy-lexar.dd +``` + +Then I could run `photorec` on the image. This brings up a TUI with all of the +listed media that I can try and recover from. + +```shell +$ sudo photorec amy-lexar.dd + +PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015 +Christophe GRENIER +http://www.cgsecurity.org + + PhotoRec is free software, and +comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. + +Select a media (use Arrow keys, then press Enter): +>Disk amy-lexar.dd - 64 GB / 59 GiB (RO) + +>[Proceed ] [ Quit ] + +Note: +Disk capacity must be correctly detected for a successful recovery. +If a disk listed above has incorrect size, check HD jumper settings, BIOS +detection, and install the latest OS patches and disk drivers. +``` + +After hitting proceed `photorec` asks if you want to scan just a particular +partition or the whole disk (if you made a whole disk image). I can usually get +away with just selecting the partition I know the files are on and starting a +search. + +```shell +PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015 +Christophe GRENIER +http://www.cgsecurity.org + +Disk amy-lexar.dd - 64 GB / 59 GiB (RO) + + Partition Start End Size in sectors + Unknown 0 0 1 7783 139 4 125042656 [Whole disk] +> P FAT32 0 0 1 7783 139 4 125042656 [NO NAME] + +>[ Search ] [Options ] [File Opt] [ Quit ] + Start file recovery +``` + +Then `photorec` asks a couple of questions about the formatting of the media. +It can usually figure them out all by itself so I just use the default options +unless it's way out in left field. + +```shell +PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015 +Christophe GRENIER +http://www.cgsecurity.org + + P FAT32 0 0 1 7783 139 4 125042656 [NO NAME] + +To recover lost files, PhotoRec need to know the filesystem type where the +file were stored: + [ ext2/ext3 ] ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystem +>[ Other ] FAT/NTFS/HFS+/ReiserFS/... +``` + +Now this menu is where I don't just go with the default path. `photorec` will +offer to search just unallocated space or the entire partition. I always go for +the whole partition here; sometimes I'll get back files that I didn't really +care about but more often than not I end up rescuing more data this way. In +this scenario searching just unallocated space found no files at all. So I told +`photorec` to search everything. + +```shell +PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015 +Christophe GRENIER +http://www.cgsecurity.org + + P FAT32 0 0 1 7783 139 4 125042656 [NO NAME] + + +Please choose if all space need to be analysed: + [ Free ] Scan for file from FAT32 unallocated space only +>[ Whole ] Extract files from whole partition +``` + +Now it'll ask where you want to save any files it finds. I threw them all into +a directory under home that I could zip up and send to Amy's Mac later. + +```shell +PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015 + +Please select a destination to save the recovered files. +Do not choose to write the files to the same partition they were stored on. +Keys: Arrow keys to select another directory + C when the destination is correct + Q to quit +Directory /home/adam + drwx------ 1000 1000 4096 28-Sep-2019 12:10 . + drwxr-xr-x 0 0 4096 26-Jan-2019 15:32 .. +>drwxr-xr-x 1000 1000 4096 28-Sep-2019 12:10 amy-lexar-recovery +``` + +And then just press `C`. `photrec` will start copying all of the files it finds +into that directory. It reports what kinds of files it found and how many it +was able to locate. I was able to recover all of Amy's lost footage this way, +past, along with some straggler files that had been on the drive at one point. +This has worked for me many times in the past, both on newer devices like flash +drives and on super old, sketchy IDE hard drives. I probably won't ever pay for +data recovery unless a drive has been physically damaged in some way. In other +words, this software works great for me and I don't foresee the need for +anything else out there. It's simple to use and is typically pretty reliable. + + + + diff --git a/posts/my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md b/posts/my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md deleted file mode 100644 index 1388de9..0000000 --- a/posts/my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,53 +0,0 @@ ---- -permalink: "/posts/{{categories}}/{{slug}}" -title: My Preferred Method for Data Recovery -categories: ["life"] -tags: - - data - - file - - photo - - recovery - - linux - - photorec -excerpt_separator: "\n\n\n" -layout: post.liquid -is_draft: true ---- - -This week Amy plugged in her flash drive to discover that there were no files -on it. Weeks before there had been dozens of large cuts of footage that she -needed to edit down for work. Hours of recordings were seemingly gone. And the -most annoying part was the drive had worked perfectly on several other -occasions. Just not now that the footage was actually needed of course. -Initially it looked like everything had been wiped clean, however both Amy's -Mac and her PC thought the drive was half full. It's overall capacity was 64GB -but it showed only about 36GB free. So there still had to be data on there if -we could find the right tool to salvage it. - -Luckily this wasn't the first time I had to recover accidentally (or magically) -deleted files. I had previously done so with some success at my tech support -job, for some college friends, and for my in-laws' retired laptops. So I had a -pretty clear idea of what to expect. The only trick was finding a tool that -knew what files it was looking for. The camera that took the video clips was a -Sony and apparently they record into `m2ts` files, which are kind of a unique -format in that they only show up on Blu-Ray discs and Sony camcorders. Enter my -favorite two tools for dealing with potentially-destroyed data: `ddrescue` and -`photorec`. - -`ddrescue` is a godsend of a tool. If you've ever used `dd` before, forget -about it. Use `ddrescue`. You might as well `alias dd=ddrescue` because it's -that great. By default it has a plethora of additional options, displays the -progress as it works, recovers and retries in the event of I/O errors, and does -everything that good old `dd` can do. It's particularly good at protecting -partitions or disks that have been corrupted or damaged by rescuing undamaged -portions first. Oh, and have you ever had to cancel a `dd` operation? Did I -mention that `ddrescue` can pause and resume copies? It's that good. - -`photorec` is probably the best missing file recovery tool I've ever used in my -entire life. And I've used quite a few. I've never had as good results as I've -had with `photorec` with other tools like Recuva et. al. And `photorec` isn't -just for photos, it can recover documents (a la Office suite), music, images, -config files, and videos (including the very odd `m2ts` format!). The other -nice thing is photorec will work on just about any source. - -- plus scan whole partition -- cgit v1.2.3