From 4829c89a5d195770bed8bcc07d063e3db1519e7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Adam T. Carpenter" <atc@53hor.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:30:07 -0500
Subject: added some drafts, finished acrobat reader post

---
 ...why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 142 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 posts/computing/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html

(limited to 'posts/computing')

diff --git a/posts/computing/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html b/posts/computing/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..06419b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/posts/computing/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+  <head>
+    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/includes/stylesheet.css" />
+    <meta charset="utf-8" />
+    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
+    <meta
+      property="og:description"
+      content="The World Wide Web pages of Adam Carpenter"
+    />
+    <meta
+      property="og:image"
+      content="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/s/iBGxB7P3BKRbj9P/preview"
+    />
+    <meta property="og:site_name" content="53hor.net" />
+    <meta
+      property="og:title"
+      content="Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?"
+    />
+    <meta property="og:type" content="website" />
+    <meta property="og:url" content="https://www.53hor.net" />
+    <title>53hornet ➙ Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?</title>
+  </head>
+
+  <body>
+    <nav>
+      <ul>
+        <li>
+          <a href="/">
+            <img src="/includes/icons/home-roof.svg" />
+            Home
+          </a>
+        </li>
+        <li>
+          <a href="/info.html">
+            <img src="/includes/icons/information-variant.svg" />
+            Info
+          </a>
+        </li>
+        <li>
+          <a href="https://git.53hor.net">
+            <img src="/includes/icons/git.svg" />
+            Repos
+          </a>
+        </li>
+        <li>
+          <a href="/hosted.html">
+            <img src="/includes/icons/desktop-tower.svg" />
+            Hosted
+          </a>
+        </li>
+        <li>
+          <a type="application/rss+xml" href="/rss.xml">
+            <img src="/includes/icons/rss.svg" />
+            RSS
+          </a>
+        </li>
+      </ul>
+    </nav>
+
+    <article>
+      <h1>Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?</h1>
+
+      <p>
+        <img src="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/s/688ztNiSAri3eDN/preview" />
+      </p>
+
+      <p>
+        This is something that I've never been able to figure out. All through
+        high school I had to use PDFs. And if you wanted to open a PDF, everyone
+        understood that you needed Adobe Acrobat Reader. Even web sites where
+        you downloaded PDFs insisted that in order to open them, you were going
+        to have to follow a download link to make sure you have Acrobat on your
+        PC.
+      </p>
+
+      <p>
+        Fast-forward a few years into college and I'm using PDFs more than ever.
+        Every professor ever is scanning and uploading course material, so out
+        comes Acrobat Reader for literally every teacher and student. At this
+        point I was actually used to using Firefox (PDF.js) to view PDFs for a
+        couple of reasons. First of all, Firefox usually opened PDFs faster than
+        Acrobat Reader did. Reader was getting bigger with every release, and
+        eventually had a monstrous UI to load up every time I wanted to open a
+        tiny PDF file. Second, Firefox had smooth scrolling for page-width
+        documents. Reader was getting slower and laggier with each release, to
+        the point where scrolling through a PDF was no longer buttery smooth but
+        jittery and stuttery. It also seemed like Reader purposefully wouldn't
+        slide the page when you used a mouse wheel. It would jump down a few
+        lines at a time like it was simulating the down arrow.
+      </p>
+
+      <p>
+        By my senior year I had switched from Windows to Linux full-time and it
+        was then I found out about <a href="https://mupdf.com/">MuPDF</a> and
+        from then on things were never the same. It's literally the best PDF
+        reader I've ever used, and I tried out quite a few. There are desktop
+        and mobile apps. It opens almost instantly. It lets you easily resize
+        the page with excellent keyboard shortcuts. There are no giant menu bars
+        on either side of the page to squish the document down to an unreadable
+        size. Having a dozen of them open at once doesn't bog down my PC. It's
+        also available for all of the relevant operating systems I've used
+        (Windows, Mac OS, Linux, FreeBSD)! Oh and password-protected PDFs are
+        supported as well.
+      </p>
+
+      <p>
+        It's a fantastic piece of software And the best part is it comes with a
+        variety of tools to edit and manipulate PDFs as well. If the folks I
+        went to school with thought you needed the free Acrobat Reader to view a
+        PDF, they sure as heck thought you needed to buy Acrobat Pro to edit
+        one. Some of them refused to pay for it and used a variety of online
+        services to upload, split or merge, and download PDFs. I honestly for
+        the life of me can't understand why. MuPDF comes with
+        <code>mutool</code>, which does all of the things I would ever need to
+        do with a PDF. It can attempt to convert a PDF to other formats, like
+        HTML. It can split and combine documents. It can even create them from
+        scratch and sign them.
+      </p>
+
+      <p>
+        It's also free and open source. Can you imagine that? PDF viewing and
+        editing being free and open source? It's AGPL (in addition to being
+        commercially) licensed by the creators. The only slight drawback is the
+        desktop version apparently does not yet let you fill out forms. Not sure
+        why but this isn't something I use very frequently.
+      </p>
+
+      <p>
+        It's not the hottest piece of tech out there, but it just plain works
+        and works really well. Maybe the only reason more people I know don't
+        use it is because Adobe is synonymous with the PDF format. It doesn't
+        seem like that big of a deal, but I feel like Acrobat has always been a
+        piece of software that has frustrated new or infrequent users in
+        computing. And that's just not good. Maybe the barrier to using MuPDF is
+        the lack of GUI and abundance of keybindings, but for me that's no
+        sweat. I'd say to anyone to just try it out and see if they like it. It
+        is free, after all.
+      </p>
+    </article>
+  </body>
+</html>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3