From aa6ade8c1bc51bc8f379442bb00710438d1385fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Adam T. Carpenter" Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 08:53:22 -0500 Subject: organized posts, added profile, started makefile --- ...est-way-to-transfer-gopro-files-with-linux.html | 133 ---------- ...9-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.html | 282 --------------------- unix/2020-07-26-now-this-is-a-minimal-install.html | 107 -------- ...ear-god-why-are-pdf-editors-such-an-ordeal.html | 79 ------ 4 files changed, 601 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 unix/2019-07-04-the-best-way-to-transfer-gopro-files-with-linux.html delete mode 100644 unix/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.html delete mode 100644 unix/2020-07-26-now-this-is-a-minimal-install.html delete mode 100644 unix/dear-god-why-are-pdf-editors-such-an-ordeal.html (limited to 'unix') diff --git a/unix/2019-07-04-the-best-way-to-transfer-gopro-files-with-linux.html b/unix/2019-07-04-the-best-way-to-transfer-gopro-files-with-linux.html deleted file mode 100644 index 15c776f..0000000 --- a/unix/2019-07-04-the-best-way-to-transfer-gopro-files-with-linux.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,133 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53hornet ➙ Offloading GoPro Footage the Easy Way! - - - - - -
-

Offloading GoPro Footage the Easy Way!

- -

- Transferring files off of most cameras to a Linux computer isn't all - that difficult. The exception is my GoPro Hero 4 Black. For 4th of July - week I took a bunch of video with the GoPro, approximately 20 MP4 files, - about 3GB each. The annoying thing about the GoPro's USB interface is - you need additional software to download everything through the cable. - The camera doesn't just show up as a USB filesystem that you can mount. - The GoPro does have a micro-SD card but I was away from home and didn't - have any dongles or adapters. Both of these solutions also mean taking - the camera out of its waterproof case and off of its mount. So here's - what I did. -

- -

- GoPro cameras, after the Hero 3, can open up an ad-hoc wireless network - that lets you browse the GoPro's onboard files through an HTTP server. - This means you can open your browser and scroll through the files on the - camera at an intranet address, 10.5.5.9, and download them - one by one by clicking every link on every page. If you have a lot of - footage on there it kinda sucks. So, I opened up the manual for - wget. I'm sure you could get really fancy with some of the - options but the only thing I cared about was downloading every single - MP4 video off of the camera, automatically. I did not want to download - any of the small video formats or actual HTML files. Here's what I used: -

- -
-        
-sh wget --recursive --accept "*.MP4" http://10.5.5.9:8080/
-		
-      
- -

- This tells wget to download all of the files at the GoPro's - address recursively and skips any that don't have the MP4 extension. Now - I've got a directory tree with all of my videos in it. And the best part - is I didn't have to install the dinky GoPro app on my laptop. Hopefully - this helps if you're looking for an easy way to migrate lots of footage - without manually clicking through the web interface or installing - additional software. The only downside is if you're moving a whole lot - of footage, it's not nearly as quick as just moving files off the SD - card. So I'd shoot for using the adapter to read off the card first and - only use this if that's not an option, such as when the camera is - mounted and you don't want to move it. -

- -

Some things I would like to change/add:

- - - -

- I could probably write a quick and dirty shell script to do all of this - for me but I use the camera so infrequently that it's probably not even - worth it. -

-
- - diff --git a/unix/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.html b/unix/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.html deleted file mode 100644 index b63ba5a..0000000 --- a/unix/2019-09-28-my-preferred-method-for-data-recovery.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,282 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53hornet ➙ How I Do Data Recovery - - - - - -
-

How I Do Data Recovery

- -

- This week Amy plugged in her flash drive to discover that there were no - files on it. Weeks before there had been dozens of large cuts of footage - that she needed to edit down for work. Hours of recordings were - seemingly gone. And the most annoying part was the drive had worked - perfectly on several other occasions. Just not now that the footage was - actually needed of course. Initially it looked like everything had been - wiped clean, however both Amy's Mac and her PC thought the drive was - half full. It's overall capacity was 64GB but it showed only about 36GB - free. So there still had to be data on there if we could find the right - tool to salvage it. -

- -

- Luckily this wasn't the first time I had to recover accidentally (or - magically) deleted files. I had previously done so with some success at - my tech support job, for some college friends, and for my in-laws' - retired laptops. So I had a pretty clear idea of what to expect. The - only trick was finding a tool that knew what files it was looking for. - The camera that took the video clips was a Sony and apparently they - record into m2ts files, which are kind of a unique format - in that they only show up on Blu-Ray discs and Sony camcorders. Enter my - favorite two tools for dealing with potentially-destroyed data: - ddrescue and photorec. -

- -

DDRescue

- -

- ddrescue is a godsend of a tool. If you've ever used - dd before, forget about it. Use ddrescue. You - might as well alias dd=ddrescue because it's that great. By - default it has a plethora of additional options, displays the progress - as it works, recovers and retries in the event of I/O errors, and does - everything that good old dd can do. It's particularly good - at protecting partitions or disks that have been corrupted or damaged by - rescuing undamaged portions first. Oh, and have you ever had to cancel a - dd operation? Did I mention that ddrescue can - pause and resume operations? It's that good. -

- -

PhotoRec

- -

- photorec is probably the best missing file recovery tool - I've ever used in my entire life. And I've used quite a few. I've never - had as good results as I've had with photorec with other - tools like Recuva et. al. And photorec isn't just for - photos, it can recover documents (a la Office suite), music, images, - config files, and videos (including the very odd - m2ts format!). The other nice thing is - photorec will work on just about any source. It's also free - software which makes me wonder why there are like $50 recovery tools for - Windows that look super sketchy. -

- -

In Practice

- -

- So here's what I did to get Amy's files back. Luckily she didn't write - anything out to the drive afterward so the chances (I thought) were - pretty good that I would get something back. The first thing I - always do is make a full image of whatever media I'm trying to recover - from. I do this for a couple of reasons. First of all it's a backup. If - something goes wrong during recovery I don't have to worry about the - original, fragile media being damaged or wiped. Furthermore, I can work - with multiple copies at a time. If it's a large image that means - multiple tools or even multiple PCs can work on it at once. It's also - just plain faster working off a disk image than a measly flash drive. So - I used ddrescue to make an image of Amy's drive. -

- -

-$ sudo ddrescue /dev/sdb1 amy-lexar.dd
-GNU ddrescue 1.24
-Press Ctrl-C to interrupt
-     ipos:   54198 kB, non-trimmed:        0 B,  current rate:   7864 kB/s
-     opos:   54198 kB, non-scraped:        0 B,  average rate:  18066 kB/s
-non-tried:   63967 MB,  bad-sector:        0 B,    error rate:       0 B/s
-  rescued:   54198 kB,   bad areas:        0,        run time:          2s
-pct rescued:    0.08%, read errors:        0,  remaining time:         59m
-                              time since last successful read:         n/a
-Copying non-tried blocks... Pass 1 (forwards)
-	  
- -

- The result was a very large partition image that I could fearlessly play - around with. -

- -
-		
-$ ll amy-lexar.dd
--rw-r--r-- 1 root root 60G Sep 24 02:45 amy-lexar.dd
-        
-	  
- -

- Then I could run photorec on the image. This brings up a - TUI with all of the listed media that I can try and recover from. -

- -

-$ sudo photorec amy-lexar.dd
-
-PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015
-http://www.cgsecurity.org
-
-  PhotoRec is free software, and
-comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
-
-Select a media (use Arrow keys, then press Enter):
->Disk amy-lexar.dd - 64 GB / 59 GiB (RO)
-
->[Proceed ]  [  Quit  ]
-
-Note:
-Disk capacity must be correctly detected for a successful recovery.
-If a disk listed above has incorrect size, check HD jumper settings, BIOS
-detection, and install the latest OS patches and disk drivers.
-	  
- -

- After hitting proceed photorec asks if you want to scan - just a particular partition or the whole disk (if you made a whole disk - image). I can usually get away with just selecting the partition I know - the files are on and starting a search. -

- -

-PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015
-http://www.cgsecurity.org
-
-Disk amy-lexar.dd - 64 GB / 59 GiB (RO)
-
-     Partition                  Start        End    Size in sectors
-      Unknown                  0   0  1  7783 139  4  125042656 [Whole disk]
->   P FAT32                    0   0  1  7783 139  4  125042656 [NO NAME]
-
->[ Search ]  [Options ]  [File Opt]  [  Quit  ]
-                              Start file recovery
-	  
- -

- Then photorec asks a couple of questions about the - formatting of the media. It can usually figure them out all by itself so - I just use the default options unless it's way out in left field. -

- -

-PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015
-http://www.cgsecurity.org
-
-   P FAT32                    0   0  1  7783 139  4  125042656 [NO NAME]
-
-To recover lost files, PhotoRec need to know the filesystem type where the
-file were stored:
- [ ext2/ext3 ] ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystem
->[ Other     ] FAT/NTFS/HFS+/ReiserFS/...
-	  
- -

- Now this menu is where I don't just go with the default path. - photorec will offer to search just unallocated space or the - entire partition. I always go for the whole partition here; sometimes - I'll get back files that I didn't really care about but more often than - not I end up rescuing more data this way. In this scenario searching - just unallocated space found no files at all. So I told - photorec to search everything. -

- -

-PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015
-http://www.cgsecurity.org
-
-   P FAT32                    0   0  1  7783 139  4  125042656 [NO NAME]
-
-
-Please choose if all space need to be analysed:
- [   Free    ] Scan for file from FAT32 unallocated space only
->[   Whole   ] Extract files from whole partition
-	  
- -

- Now it'll ask where you want to save any files it finds. I threw them - all into a directory under home that I could zip up and send to Amy's - Mac later. -

- -

-PhotoRec 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015
-
-Please select a destination to save the recovered files.
-Do not choose to write the files to the same partition they were stored on.
-Keys: Arrow keys to select another directory
-      C when the destination is correct
-      Q to quit
-Directory /home/adam
- drwx------  1000  1000      4096 28-Sep-2019 12:10 .
- drwxr-xr-x     0     0      4096 26-Jan-2019 15:32 ..
->drwxr-xr-x  1000  1000      4096 28-Sep-2019 12:10 amy-lexar-recovery
-	  
- -

- And then just press C. photrec will start - copying all of the files it finds into that directory. It reports what - kinds of files it found and how many it was able to locate. I was able - to recover all of Amy's lost footage this way, past, along with some - straggler files that had been on the drive at one point. This has worked - for me many times in the past, both on newer devices like flash drives - and on super old, sketchy IDE hard drives. I probably won't ever pay for - data recovery unless a drive has been physically damaged in some way. In - other words, this software works great for me and I don't foresee the - need for anything else out there. It's simple to use and is typically - pretty reliable. -

-
- - diff --git a/unix/2020-07-26-now-this-is-a-minimal-install.html b/unix/2020-07-26-now-this-is-a-minimal-install.html deleted file mode 100644 index 07a398a..0000000 --- a/unix/2020-07-26-now-this-is-a-minimal-install.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,107 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53hornet ➙ Now This is a Minimal Install! - - - - - -
-

Now This is a Minimal Install!

- -

- I just got done configuring Poudriere on Freebsd 12.1-RELEASE. The - awesome thing about it is it allows you to configure and maintain your - own package repository. All of the ports and their dependencies are - built from source with personalized options. That means that I can - maintain my own repo of just the packages I need with just the - compile-time options I need. For example, for the Nvidia driver set I - disabled all Wayland related flags. I use Xorg so there was no need to - have that functionality built in. -

- -

- Compile times are pretty long but I hope to change that by upgrading my - home server to FreeBSD as well (from Ubuntu Server). Then I can - configure poudriere to serve up a ports tree and my own pkg repo from - there. The server is a lot faster than my laptop and will build packages - way faster, and I'll be able to use those packages on both the server - and my laptop and any jails I have running. Jails (and ZFS) also make - poudriere really cool to use as all of the building is done inside a - jail. When the time comes I can just remove the jail and poudriere ports - tree from my laptop and update pkg to point to my web server. -

- -

- This is, as I understand it, the sane way to do package management in - FreeBSD. The binary package repo is basically the ports tree - pre-assembled with default options. Sometimes those packages are - compiled without functionality that most users don't need. In those - situations, you're forced to use ports. The trouble is you're not really - supposed to mix ports and binary packages. The reason, again as I - understand it, is because ports are updated more frequently. So binary - packages and ports can have different dependency versions, which can - sometimes break compatibility on an upgrade. Most FreeBSD users - recommend installing everything with ports (which is just a make install - inside the local tree) but then you lose the package management features - that come with pkg. Poudriere lets you kind of do both by creating your - "own personal binary repo" out of a list of preconfigured, pre-built - ports. -

- -

FreeBSD rocks.

-
- - diff --git a/unix/dear-god-why-are-pdf-editors-such-an-ordeal.html b/unix/dear-god-why-are-pdf-editors-such-an-ordeal.html deleted file mode 100644 index 9adc833..0000000 --- a/unix/dear-god-why-are-pdf-editors-such-an-ordeal.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,79 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53hornet ➙ All PDF Readers/Editors Suck - - - - - -
-

All PDF Readers/Editors Suck

- -

All PDF editors/mergers/tools either:

- -
    -
  1. Cost hundreds of dollars
  2. -
  3. Require uploading private documents to a server for processing
  4. -
  5. Leave watermarks or charge you for "pro" features
  6. -
  7. Are blatant malware
  8. -
- -

- Except mupdf and mutool, which are absolutely amazing and I can't live - without them. -

-
- - -- cgit v1.2.3