diff options
| author | Adam T. Carpenter <atc@53hor.net> | 2021-04-21 22:57:39 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adam T. Carpenter <atc@53hor.net> | 2021-04-21 22:57:39 -0400 |
| commit | 890b34bcc1a6b4073d1e512b1386634f7bc5ea52 (patch) | |
| tree | 17efbec82a5bc118c2ae0b3ec56acbf159e4edda /posts/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html | |
| parent | e87bdb082057c4eddd1af159374b667c7fe234d4 (diff) | |
| download | 53hor-890b34bcc1a6b4073d1e512b1386634f7bc5ea52.tar.xz 53hor-890b34bcc1a6b4073d1e512b1386634f7bc5ea52.zip | |
unified posts dir, until I can figure out makefile sub-subdirs. makefile auto-generates index
Diffstat (limited to 'posts/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | posts/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html | 144 |
1 files changed, 144 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html b/posts/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..81136e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/posts/2020-12-22-why-does-everyone-use-adobe-acrobat-reader.html @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html> + <head> + <link rel="stylesheet" href="/includes/stylesheet.css" /> + <meta charset="utf-8" /> + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" /> + <meta + property="og:description" + content="The World Wide Web pages of Adam Carpenter" + /> + <meta + property="og:image" + content="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/index.php/s/Nx9e7iHbw4t99wo/preview" + /> + <meta property="og:site_name" content="53hor.net" /> + <meta + property="og:title" + content="Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?" + /> + <meta property="og:type" content="website" /> + <meta property="og:url" content="https://www.53hor.net" /> + <title>53hornet ➙ Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?</title> + </head> + + <body> + <nav> + <ul> + <li> + <a href="/"> + <img src="/includes/icons/home-roof.svg" /> + Home + </a> + </li> + <li> + <a href="/info.html"> + <img src="/includes/icons/information-variant.svg" /> + Info + </a> + </li> + <li> + <a href="https://git.53hor.net"> + <img src="/includes/icons/git.svg" /> + Repos + </a> + </li> + <li> + <a href="/hosted.html"> + <img src="/includes/icons/desktop-tower.svg" /> + Hosted + </a> + </li> + <li> + <a type="application/rss+xml" href="/rss.xml"> + <img src="/includes/icons/rss.svg" /> + RSS + </a> + </li> + </ul> + </nav> + + <article> + <h1>Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?</h1> + + <p> + <img + src="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/index.php/s/Pq8ZPe8THoH3Eoo/preview" + /> + </p> + + <p> + This is something that I've never been able to figure out. All through + high school I had to use PDFs. And if you wanted to open a PDF, everyone + understood that you needed Adobe Acrobat Reader. Even web sites where + you downloaded PDFs insisted that in order to open them, you were going + to have to follow a download link to make sure you have Acrobat on your + PC. + </p> + + <p> + Fast-forward a few years into college and I'm using PDFs more than ever. + Every professor ever is scanning and uploading course material, so out + comes Acrobat Reader for literally every teacher and student. At this + point I was actually used to using Firefox (PDF.js) to view PDFs for a + couple of reasons. First of all, Firefox usually opened PDFs faster than + Acrobat Reader did. Reader was getting bigger with every release, and + eventually had a monstrous UI to load up every time I wanted to open a + tiny PDF file. Second, Firefox had smooth scrolling for page-width + documents. Reader was getting slower and laggier with each release, to + the point where scrolling through a PDF was no longer buttery smooth but + jittery and stuttery. It also seemed like Reader purposefully wouldn't + slide the page when you used a mouse wheel. It would jump down a few + lines at a time like it was simulating the down arrow. + </p> + + <p> + By my senior year I had switched from Windows to Linux full-time and it + was then I found out about <a href="https://mupdf.com/">MuPDF</a> and + from then on things were never the same. It's literally the best PDF + reader I've ever used, and I tried out quite a few. There are desktop + and mobile apps. It opens almost instantly. It lets you easily resize + the page with excellent keyboard shortcuts. There are no giant menu bars + on either side of the page to squish the document down to an unreadable + size. Having a dozen of them open at once doesn't bog down my PC. It's + also available for all of the relevant operating systems I've used + (Windows, Mac OS, Linux, FreeBSD)! Oh and password-protected PDFs are + supported as well. + </p> + + <p> + It's a fantastic piece of software And the best part is it comes with a + variety of tools to edit and manipulate PDFs as well. If the folks I + went to school with thought you needed the free Acrobat Reader to view a + PDF, they sure as heck thought you needed to buy Acrobat Pro to edit + one. Some of them refused to pay for it and used a variety of online + services to upload, split or merge, and download PDFs. I honestly for + the life of me can't understand why. MuPDF comes with + <code>mutool</code>, which does all of the things I would ever need to + do with a PDF. It can attempt to convert a PDF to other formats, like + HTML. It can split and combine documents. It can even create them from + scratch and sign them. + </p> + + <p> + It's also free and open source. Can you imagine that? PDF viewing and + editing being free and open source? It's AGPL (in addition to being + commercially) licensed by the creators. The only slight drawback is the + desktop version apparently does not yet let you fill out forms. Not sure + why but this isn't something I use very frequently. + </p> + + <p> + It's not the hottest piece of tech out there, but it just plain works + and works really well. Maybe the only reason more people I know don't + use it is because Adobe is synonymous with the PDF format. It doesn't + seem like that big of a deal, but I feel like Acrobat has always been a + piece of software that has frustrated new or infrequent users in + computing. And that's just not good. Maybe the barrier to using MuPDF is + the lack of GUI and abundance of keybindings, but for me that's no + sweat. I'd say to anyone to just try it out and see if they like it. It + is free, after all. + </p> + </article> + </body> +</html> |