1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/includes/stylesheet.css" />
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
<meta
property="og:description"
content="The World Wide Web pages of Adam Carpenter"
/>
<meta
property="og:image"
content="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/index.php/s/Nx9e7iHbw4t99wo/preview"
/>
<meta property="og:site_name" content="53hor.net" />
<meta
property="og:title"
content="Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?"
/>
<meta property="og:type" content="website" />
<meta property="og:url" content="https://www.53hor.net" />
<title>53hornet ➙ Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?</title>
</head>
<body>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="/">
<img src="/includes/icons/home-roof.svg" />
Home
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/info.html">
<img src="/includes/icons/information-variant.svg" />
Info
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://git.53hor.net">
<img src="/includes/icons/git.svg" />
Repos
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/hosted.html">
<img src="/includes/icons/desktop-tower.svg" />
Hosted
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a type="application/rss+xml" href="/rss.xml">
<img src="/includes/icons/rss.svg" />
RSS
</a>
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<article>
<h1>Why Does Everyone Use Adobe Acrobat [Reader]?</h1>
<p>
<img
src="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/index.php/s/Pq8ZPe8THoH3Eoo/preview"
/>
</p>
<p>
This is something that I've never been able to figure out. All through
high school I had to use PDFs. And if you wanted to open a PDF, everyone
understood that you needed Adobe Acrobat Reader. Even web sites where
you downloaded PDFs insisted that in order to open them, you were going
to have to follow a download link to make sure you have Acrobat on your
PC.
</p>
<p>
Fast-forward a few years into college and I'm using PDFs more than ever.
Every professor ever is scanning and uploading course material, so out
comes Acrobat Reader for literally every teacher and student. At this
point I was actually used to using Firefox (PDF.js) to view PDFs for a
couple of reasons. First of all, Firefox usually opened PDFs faster than
Acrobat Reader did. Reader was getting bigger with every release, and
eventually had a monstrous UI to load up every time I wanted to open a
tiny PDF file. Second, Firefox had smooth scrolling for page-width
documents. Reader was getting slower and laggier with each release, to
the point where scrolling through a PDF was no longer buttery smooth but
jittery and stuttery. It also seemed like Reader purposefully wouldn't
slide the page when you used a mouse wheel. It would jump down a few
lines at a time like it was simulating the down arrow.
</p>
<p>
By my senior year I had switched from Windows to Linux full-time and it
was then I found out about <a href="https://mupdf.com/">MuPDF</a> and
from then on things were never the same. It's literally the best PDF
reader I've ever used, and I tried out quite a few. There are desktop
and mobile apps. It opens almost instantly. It lets you easily resize
the page with excellent keyboard shortcuts. There are no giant menu bars
on either side of the page to squish the document down to an unreadable
size. Having a dozen of them open at once doesn't bog down my PC. It's
also available for all of the relevant operating systems I've used
(Windows, Mac OS, Linux, FreeBSD)! Oh and password-protected PDFs are
supported as well.
</p>
<p>
It's a fantastic piece of software And the best part is it comes with a
variety of tools to edit and manipulate PDFs as well. If the folks I
went to school with thought you needed the free Acrobat Reader to view a
PDF, they sure as heck thought you needed to buy Acrobat Pro to edit
one. Some of them refused to pay for it and used a variety of online
services to upload, split or merge, and download PDFs. I honestly for
the life of me can't understand why. MuPDF comes with
<code>mutool</code>, which does all of the things I would ever need to
do with a PDF. It can attempt to convert a PDF to other formats, like
HTML. It can split and combine documents. It can even create them from
scratch and sign them.
</p>
<p>
It's also free and open source. Can you imagine that? PDF viewing and
editing being free and open source? It's AGPL (in addition to being
commercially) licensed by the creators. The only slight drawback is the
desktop version apparently does not yet let you fill out forms. Not sure
why but this isn't something I use very frequently.
</p>
<p>
It's not the hottest piece of tech out there, but it just plain works
and works really well. Maybe the only reason more people I know don't
use it is because Adobe is synonymous with the PDF format. It doesn't
seem like that big of a deal, but I feel like Acrobat has always been a
piece of software that has frustrated new or infrequent users in
computing. And that's just not good. Maybe the barrier to using MuPDF is
the lack of GUI and abundance of keybindings, but for me that's no
sweat. I'd say to anyone to just try it out and see if they like it. It
is free, after all.
</p>
</article>
</body>
</html>
|
