summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
author53hornet <atc@53hor.net>2021-09-07 14:23:27 -0400
committer53hornet <atc@53hor.net>2021-09-07 14:23:27 -0400
commit2901cf43bf45ff322fb62286c3bf1594b55c20ee (patch)
tree9c3ce172133e70935f1030524ecf9e460eebf557 /drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php
parentbfaccc32571df8a02f69518d8864244efba3b5b5 (diff)
download53hor-2901cf43bf45ff322fb62286c3bf1594b55c20ee.tar.xz
53hor-2901cf43bf45ff322fb62286c3bf1594b55c20ee.zip
chore: rename html to php, add donate/payments page, update cv
Diffstat (limited to 'drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php')
-rw-r--r--drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php72
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php b/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8b5462e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drafts/html-for-docs-2020.php
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+<h1>Writing Documents: Markdown? LaTeX? WINWORD.EXE? Nope, just HTML</h1>
+
+<p>
+ <img src="https://nextcloud.53hor.net/index.php/s/XaZRfgK3G7ZzWbs/preview" />
+</p>
+
+<p class="description">
+ I've been without MS Word for quite a few years since I switched away from
+ Windows and honestly I haven't needed it. I took notes and wrote documents in
+ Markdown for a while. That was alright because the syntax is easy and any text
+ editor can read a Markdown file. Sometimes I need shareable formatting, so
+ recently I started using HTML for all documents I intend to share, upload, or
+ print.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ The year is 2021 and I write all my formatted documents in HTML. It sounds
+ needless but if you think about it it makes a lot of sense. HTML after all was
+ designed to be the streaming document of choice when the web was introduced to
+ the world. So it's tailor-made for shareable, digital documents.
+ <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/"
+ >Over the years the specification has gotten larger</a
+ >, and most of the syntax required by a typical user is present.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ But why bother? What are the "benefits"? Well, HTML is ubiquitous. And by that
+ I mean literally <em>everyone</em> can read an HTML document because literally
+ everyone has a web browser installed. Friends don't have Word? Use Google
+ Docs? Use Apple Pages? Forget it. I bet you all of those folks have a web
+ browser that was made after 1999. That means they can all read your document,
+ either by visiting it on your site or receiving it in an email.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ What's easier than reading HTML is writing it. Anyone with a text editor can
+ do it. Heck, even those folks with Word installed can save their documents as
+ [reasonable] HTML. And the tags aren't that hard to learn. I don't think that
+ Markdown is an easier syntax to learn and understand. HTML's tags are only
+ slightly more verbose and the structure is a pro, not a con. It's certainly
+ easier than writing a document in LaTeX. I would even argue in some ways it's
+ easier than working with a WYSIWYG editor. At least the formatting you're
+ looking for isn't getting shuffled from menu to sub-menu.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ Sometimes folks want a PDF instead. Okay, fine. For whatever reason PDFs are
+ the reigning document of the land. That doesn't mean you need Adobe Acrobat or
+ some custom setup involving
+ <code>wkhtmltopdf</code>. Or even worse, some strange LaTeX middleware via
+ <code>pandoc</code>. You don't need any of that! The best PDF reader in the
+ world, MuPDF, also comes with <code>mutool</code>.
+ <code>mutool convert [options] file [pages]</code> will convert a variety of
+ formats to or from a PDF. And the results look terrific going from an HTML to
+ a PDF. If you want, you can customize the results by writing CSS into
+ <code>@media print</code> queries. Automate the creation with a script when
+ you safe the underlying document. Sky's the limit!
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ But what about presentations or slideshows? Surely, the "minimal" solution is
+ to use something like Suckless' <code>sent</code> right? Well, you can also do
+ slideshows in HTML! Just a little CSS and some <code>section</code> and
+ <code>a</code> tags and you've got a click-able, full-browser slideshow with
+ images, links, titles, icons, flowcharts, embedded videos, and a printable
+ slide deck. And the best part is that you can instantly share online by
+ dropping it into a public web root. You don't have to use Google Slides or
+ some other third-party slide creator online that none of your friends use.
+ Heck, Suckless <code>sent</code> is just that: yet another slideshow tool that
+ does one thing and nobody but you has it installed. Your HTML slides are
+ <em>just as plain text</em> as a <code>sent</code> deck.
+</p>